<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>judgment on Agile Software Development</title>
    <link>https://agilesoftdev.com/tags/judgment/</link>
    <description>Recent content in judgment on Agile Software Development</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://agilesoftdev.com/tags/judgment/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Decisions That Remain Irreducibly Human</title>
      <link>https://agilesoftdev.com/the-decisions-that-remain-irreducibly-human/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://agilesoftdev.com/the-decisions-that-remain-irreducibly-human/</guid>
      <description>The conversation about AI in software development tends to collapse into two positions: either AI will replace developers, or AI is just a faster autocomplete. Both positions avoid the more interesting question, which is about the specific category of decisions that cannot be delegated and why.
Some decisions remain irreducibly human not because the technology is insufficient but because the decision requires accountability, context, and judgment that exist outside the codebase.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
