<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SAFe on Agile Software Development</title>
    <link>https://agilesoftdev.com/tags/safe/</link>
    <description>Recent content in SAFe on Agile Software Development</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://agilesoftdev.com/tags/safe/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Most Teams Adopting Scaling Frameworks Do Not Need Them</title>
      <link>https://agilesoftdev.com/most-teams-adopting-scaling-frameworks-do-not-need-them/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://agilesoftdev.com/most-teams-adopting-scaling-frameworks-do-not-need-them/</guid>
      <description>The scaling agile industry — SAFe, LeSS, Nexus, Scrum@Scale, and their variants — exists to solve a real problem: how do you coordinate multiple agile teams working toward a shared product without recreating waterfall planning at the portfolio level? The problem is genuine. The solution is frequently applied to organizations that do not have it.
The typical trigger for a scaling framework adoption is not coordination failure between teams — it is discomfort at the leadership level with the absence of a visible, organization-wide plan.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
